Compare HEPCon with the platforms on your shortlist

How to read these comparisons

Each page checks the same six things, because they are the six that decide the choice for a research programme: how the programme gets into the app and whether it stays current when the committee edits it; whether the price is per event or per attendee, and whether it is published; where attendee data is hosted; whether the programme works offline, in a basement lecture hall with no signal; whether LaTeX in titles and abstracts renders as mathematics; and what the organizer gets afterwards, from a usage report to a report for each sponsor.

The claims about the other vendor come from its own documentation and price list, and each page carries the date they were checked. Where a vendor does something HEPCon does not, the page says so. The fastest way to settle the question is still a preview of your own programme, which takes about half a minute from a public link.